Bug or not?

Having problems with our website? Can't seem to find what you are looking for? Ask your questions here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Toni
Sponsor
Sponsor
Posts: 3186
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: Graham

Bug or not?

Post by Toni » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:01 am

1) I noticed that for the Puyallup River in the submit report section there is North Puyallup, South Puyallup and Puyallup. There aren't any forks in the title. There isn't any north or south Puyallup Rivers. It is just the Puyallup River. I just posted one in the South Puyallup River.

2) There are no river overviews any more. Do you know what happened to them?
Look for Wannafish A Lure on FaceBook

He said, “Throw your net on the right side of the boat and you will find some.” When they did, they were unable to haul the net in because of the large number of fish.

User avatar
Mike Carey
Owner/Editor
Owner/Editor
Posts: 7765
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

RE:Bug or not?

Post by Mike Carey » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:30 pm

The river list came from WSGS listings (I think) and that was it for the puy. As to the river info pages, that's a darn good question. I'll ask Aaron.
Image

"Takers get the honey, Givers sing the blues".

User avatar
flinginpooh
Captain
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:00 pm
Location: bonney lake

RE:Bug or not?

Post by flinginpooh » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:30 pm

Hey toni I was looking and the north and south puyallup are above electron. Below electron is just considered the puyallup. I ? it when I saw your report of south puyallup. I never heard of it I said lol. Basically there is 2 feeds off of rainier that make up the puyallup above electron. Im really not thinking there is gonna be any salmon that high up the river but who knows. There should be some nice trout in there though.
More fish please!

User avatar
Toni
Sponsor
Sponsor
Posts: 3186
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: Graham

RE:Bug or not?

Post by Toni » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:41 pm

flinginpooh wrote:Hey toni I was looking and the north and south puyallup are above electron. Below electron is just considered the puyallup. I ? it when I saw your report of south puyallup. I never heard of it I said lol. Basically there is 2 feeds off of rainier that make up the puyallup above electron. Im really not thinking there is gonna be any salmon that high up the river but who knows. There should be some nice trout in there though.

I have only heard of the Puyallup or the little Puyallup. What map? I read that it was Mowich River.
No salmon from the mouth of the Carbon up river from there. Fishing that is.
Look for Wannafish A Lure on FaceBook

He said, “Throw your net on the right side of the boat and you will find some.” When they did, they were unable to haul the net in because of the large number of fish.

User avatar
flinginpooh
Captain
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:00 pm
Location: bonney lake

RE:Bug or not?

Post by flinginpooh » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:50 pm

www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/.../images/puy.gif this is the one I used there is alot of creeks that feed the puyallup above electron. This map didnt show those. But the satellite imagery did. There is heavily treed area that Im thinkin is the north puyallup. There was pictures I found that someone took labeled south puyallup and north puyallup. Those were taken up around rainier.
More fish please!

User avatar
Toni
Sponsor
Sponsor
Posts: 3186
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: Graham

RE:Bug or not?

Post by Toni » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:19 pm

I couldn't get the link to work.
Look for Wannafish A Lure on FaceBook

He said, “Throw your net on the right side of the boat and you will find some.” When they did, they were unable to haul the net in because of the large number of fish.

Post Reply