Sea Lions' Last Meal?

For all of your non-fishing related conversations. If it's not about fishing, or you want to "test" the forum, post it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Drewp
Commander
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:39 pm
Location: seattle

Sea Lions' Last Meal?

Post by Drewp » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:53 pm

I sure hope this comes to pass: http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.c ... +Sea+lions

Would be a very nice start to one of the many reasons salmon runs are declining. Not to mention it would also help out the oversized sturgeon that also fall victim to the FB's.

=d> =d> =d> =d> =d> =d> =d>

Now if we could just get nets out of the rivers ....
"My fingers smell fishy and I like it."

User avatar
Derrick-k
Commander
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: kent Wa

RE:Sea Lions' Last Meal?

Post by Derrick-k » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:07 pm

All I have to say is, its about time.

User avatar
A9
Rear Admiral One Star
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:04 pm

RE:Sea Lions' Last Meal?

Post by A9 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:38 pm

Consider it a small step. They were asking for almost 100 to be killed. They only got 30 if I remember.


This won't happen for a while though. Don't plan on it happening this spring...Some environmental group will step in, take it to court and slow this process down...
Don't chase reports...Be the report others chase....

User avatar
cavdad45
Commodore
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:16 am
Location: beavercreek, or

RE:Sea Lions' Last Meal?

Post by cavdad45 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:14 pm

30 is a small number compared to the numbers that habitually stake a claim near the fish ladders at Bonneville. The entire species is out of control. We see them all the way up to the Falls on the Willamette. Historically they never went much further inland than Longview, but since the government listed them as a "protected species" not "endangered" or "threatened", that leads me to believe that they are guarded for emotional reasons, not scientific or economic reasons.

I have always believed that they should be managed like any other species to control their populations. Even if it means hunting or trapping them. How many endangered runs of salmon and steelhead have been lost because we have mismanaged one species.

No, 30 per year is not nearly enough. And though I understand that other factors affect fish populations, sea lion predadation is one factor that needs to be corrected.

By the way, I doubt that any sea lions will be killed because some animal rights group will have it in the courts by Monday afternoon with an injunction in hand and signed by a sympathetic, bleeding heart judge.

Post Reply